Friday, January 19, 2018

pronouns - That vs Which when talking about a subject











This is actually the title of a question I just asked a minute ago ::- ). While writing it, I remembered one of my most terrible dilemmas ever: when to use "which" and when to use "that"? Even worse, Microsoft Word sometimes forces me to add comas before "which".



Phrase in question:




What tense to use when writing about an ongoing action in a text which will be published / read in the future





vs




What tense to use when writing about an ongoing action in a text that will be published / read in the future



Answer



which and that are both correct.




I don't think you really need our help on this. You just need to have more confidence in your own writing. But if you really want to know:




The cat, which was sitting in the tree, miaowed.




Here, the sub-clause sitting in the tree gives you extra information. The commas around which was sitting in the tree show that you could delete the sub-clause, and the sentence would still be valid:




The cat miaowed.





For this kind of sub-clause, which we call non-restrictive, you should use which.



Now compare to:




The cat which was sitting in the tree miaowed.



The cat that was sitting in the tree miaowed.





Here, the sub-clause specifies which cat you are talking about. If you delete the sub-clause the sentence is no longer valid. It is called a restrictive sub-clause.



In a restrictive sub-clause, that and which are both fine. Some of the more prescriptive style guides recommend that you should reserve which for restrictive sub-clauses, but that is really just a matter of taste.



MS Word's style checker follows these more prescriptive style guides, so when it sees a which it assumes that you are using a non-restrictive sub-clause, and insists that you add commas. Needless to say, MS Word is wrong.


No comments:

Post a Comment