Saturday, September 17, 2016

history - Origin of the irregular contraction of "not"

All the contractions seem to follow some sort of logic: they place the mark between the words, and leave only the part of the sound that is predominantly heard ("I will" -> "I'll", "you have" -> "you've"). But with "not", the mark is placed right in the middle of the word (like in "does not"-> "doesn't" ), leaving the "n" attached to the previous word.



Is this an historical accident (and if it is, how it was born?), or does it have some (may be phonetic) explanation?

No comments:

Post a Comment