The verb be is the only one that has a past subjunctive form. In some cases, be, as a subjunctive, retains its present form even if the sentence is in the past tense.
Example:
Present: It is essential that she be present.
Past: It was essential that she be present.
However, in other cases, namely, conditional sentences and subordinating conjunctions, we use the past form of the subjunctive
Example:
If there were a death penalty for corporations, Enron may have earned
it.
So two questions here:
- Is there a reason the subjunctive be remains in its present form in some past
tense constructs, yet is converted to the past form were in some
others? - And if we use the were-subjunctive to express contrary-to-the-fact
clauses, then why Shakespeare said this?
If music be the food of love, play on.
No comments:
Post a Comment